One evidence base carries a category question from scan through ideation to a concept that can be tested, so nothing is lost in a hand-off.
From a category scan to test-ready concepts, run by one person
Client
Date
$10B+ global hygiene and health group, corporate venturing unit
09/2026
The challenge
The corporate venturing unit of a $10B+ global hygiene and health group is asked to find, build and test new businesses in and around its parent's categories. One person carried the research behind that mandate: scanning categories, generating and screening ideas, building concepts, and sizing up the companies already operating in the space.
The solution
FifthRow deployed its venture pipeline as a set of systems the unit ran itself. A category goes in; whitespace, ranked ideas, full concept dossiers and investment memos on the companies already in that space come out, every one of them built to the same evidence standard.
100,246
analyst-hours equivalent, 117 FTEs9 concepts
built to one evidence standardA venturing unit cannot pick a bet before it knows where the gaps are. Scanning runs across a category and its adjacencies, returning what is moving, who is already there and where nobody is.
Core Activities
- Read what is shifting across social, technological, economic, environmental and political conditions in a category
- Mapped the competitive field and the substitutes already serving the same need
- Sized the addressable market and the value pools inside it, with the evidence attached
- Identified where demand is unmet rather than where supply is crowded
- Returned every category in the same structure, so one scan can be set beside another
The Results
A structured read of a category, its adjacencies and its gaps, produced in an afternoon and carrying the evidence behind every figure, which is what a venture bet gets argued from rather than a headline growth rate.
9,168
analyst-hours equivalent, category and whitespace scanningIdeas are easy to produce and hard to rank. This is where a whitespace becomes a scored, ordered shortlist that survives a challenge from the people who have already tried things in the category.
Core Activities
- Generated candidate ideas directly from the identified gaps, not from a workshop backlog
- Fed the unit's own past learnings in as an input, so known dead ends are not proposed again
- Mapped the jobs to be done and the customer segments behind each idea
- Scored each one on feasibility, on willingness to pay, and on the parent's own right to win
- Merged near-duplicates and ranked the survivors, with the reasoning attached to each
The Results
A ranked shortlist with an argument behind every position, so the choice of what to take forward is made on evidence rather than on whoever advocates hardest for their own idea.
15 to 3
ideas narrowed to a test-ready shortlistA shortlisted idea is still a sentence. Concept building turns each one into a dossier a venture board can read: who it is for, what it is worth, how it makes money and what would stop it.
Core Activities
- Turned a one-line idea into a full concept, with personas, jobs and a value proposition
- Sized the market for that specific concept rather than for the category around it
- Set out the business model, the revenue pathways and the pricing logic
- Checked the regulatory position and the technology readiness behind the concept
- Returned each one as a venture summary and pitch material, in the same shape every time
The Results
Nine concept dossiers built to one standard, each carrying its own market size, business model, regulatory position and risks, which is what makes a set of concepts comparable instead of a folder of pitches.
~90 minutes
from a one-line idea to a full conceptBuilding is only one of the ways a venturing unit can enter a space. The same evidence standard was pointed at the companies already operating in it, so building, partnering and buying are weighed on comparable ground.
Core Activities
- Produced full investment memos on external candidates, from thesis to exit pathway
- Assessed each one on positioning, moat, leadership capacity and capital trajectory
- Mapped patent and trademark position alongside the commercial case
- Tracked what candidate companies launch, hire, partner on and announce
- Ran side-by-side comparisons, so two candidates are read against one framework
The Results
A diligence pack on any company in the space, produced in about an hour and to the same depth every time, which lets a small unit look at a whole field rather than at the two or three companies it had time for.
30,127
analyst-hours equivalent, external candidate diligenceA concept that never meets a customer stays an opinion. The shortlisted concepts were taken through to landing pages built on a validation structure, ready for a market to react to.
Core Activities
- Took each shortlisted concept through to its own positioning, copy and pricing logic
- Built a landing page per concept on a conversion-tested structure rather than a blank template
- Kept the three pages distinct enough to read as genuinely different offers
- Left the pages editable by the unit itself, so wording stays with the people who know the market
- Held the concept dossier and the page on one evidence base, so the page claims what the research supports
The Results
Every concept on the shortlist arrives as something a market can respond to rather than as a document, which removes the build step that normally sits between deciding to test an idea and being able to.
3 of 3
shortlisted concepts taken to test-ready pagesWhat it proved
A category question went in and came back as fifteen ranked ideas, a shortlist of three, nine full concept dossiers and three landing pages a market could react to. Alongside that, six investment memos and four company deep dives covered the businesses already operating in the same space. Across the engagement that is 556 runs and 1,224 analysis steps, 72,280 sources and 12,414 research questions answered from them.
The unit came out holding a venture funnel it can run rather than commission: a category scanned, an idea ranked against feasibility and willingness to pay, a concept built to a dossier, a page put in front of a market. Because internal concepts and external companies are assessed on the same standard, a build-or-buy question is settled on comparable ground instead of on two incomparable pieces of work. Across those 556 runs the platform records 100,246 analyst-hours saved, the equivalent of 117 full-time analysts. The figure is that large because one person ran the unit's entire research load through the platform over five months.
Results
| Metric | Benchmark | Result | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Output reliability | The unit's own completed venture work | Directionally consistent with it | Criterion the unit set in advance was met |
| Concept development | A dossier assembled by hand from separate research tasks | Roughly 90 minutes per full concept | Built in an afternoon, not a work package |
| Shortlisting | Ideas argued on judgement alone | Scored on feasibility, willingness to pay and right to win | Shortlist carries its own reasoning |
| External candidate assessment | A memo per company, worked up manually | About an hour per investment memo | Whole candidate field covered, not a sample |
| Analyst-hours saved | One person carrying the unit's research | 100,246 hours across 556 runs | Equivalent of adding 117 full-time analysts |
Ideas are ranked on feasibility, willingness to pay and the company's own right to win, so a shortlist can be defended rather than only asserted.
Internal concepts and external companies are assessed against the same evidence standard, so an entry decision is made on comparable ground.
A single person runs the research load a venture team would carry, so a small unit covers a whole category instead of the corner of it there was time for.
A chosen concept arrives as a page a market can react to, so validation starts without a separate build step in between.
The scanning, ideation, concept and diligence systems stay in place, so the next category starts from a working method rather than a blank brief.
From a standing start to an AI venture serving small businesses
From 72 patents to 4 commercialisation-ready technologies
Cutting a four-month research cycle to six weeks across five validation workstreams
From a weekly newsletter to a self-running innovation radar
A full year's validated-concept target, met in the first quarter
A utility innovation lab that answers its own questions in a day
Finding the next high-growth US metro in five days
FifthRow – The Agentic Consultancy
Copyright 2026 FifthRow Inc., Privacy policy