From an idea backlog to a market-tested concept in ten weeks

Client

Date

Mid-market US commercial equipment manufacturer

09/2026

The challenge

A mid-market US manufacturer of commercial equipment had roughly a hundred new product ideas on its list and a three-person team to work through them. Each idea needed a market size, a competitor and pricing read, a regulatory check and a cost-to-market estimate, and none of that was research anyone had time to do.

The solution

FifthRow encoded the team's own six-criterion screen as a single system. A product idea goes in; a scored read on need, market size, strategic fit, cost and time to market, competition and regulatory exposure comes out, with a ranking and an executive summary written for the people who approve a build. The concepts that come out the top are then market-tested - put in front of real buyers on a live offer at a real price - so the ranking is settled by measured demand rather than by the screen alone.

104,636

analyst-hours equivalent, 211 FTEs

6 of 6

of the team's own screening criteria encoded

Backlog screened63 product ideas scored to one standard

Screening methodThe team's own six criteria, encoded

Cycle time per ideaRoughly 36 minutes, end to end

Evidence per idea830 sources, 147 questions answered

Analyst-hours equivalent104,636 hours saved; equivalent to 211 FTEs

01 — CATEGORY & COMPETITOR GROUNDING

Scoring ideas against a market nobody has mapped produces confident nonsense. The first weeks went on the ground truth: what the categories look like, who already sells into them, at what prices, and where nobody is.

Core Activities

Mapped the category landscape the new products would have to compete in
Compared incumbent products feature by feature, with their published price points
Found where existing ranges overlap and where they leave gaps
Ran a whitespace read to surface areas nobody is serving well
Screened adjacent businesses as an alternative route into a category

The Results

A shared, evidenced picture of the categories, the competitors and the prices they hold, which is what every later idea score is measured against rather than against opinion in the room.

15,835

analyst-hours equivalent, category groundwork

02 — SCREENING CRITERIA ENCODING

The team already knew how it wanted ideas judged. It had six criteria and no way to apply them consistently across a backlog. Each one became its own analysis inside a single screen.

Core Activities

Took the six criteria the team had written down and encoded each as an analysis
Scored strategic fit against the company's own strategy documents, kept private to the account
Added a common scoring scale, so a score means the same thing on every idea
Ended the screen in the executive summary the team needs to approve a build
Put every idea in through the same intake, so nothing is judged on a better brief

The Results

One screen that answers all six of the team's questions about an idea and hands back a ranked, comparable result with a summary attached, instead of six separate research jobs and a meeting.

9 analyses

behind a single idea's score

03 — BACKLOG-SCALE SCREENING

A good screen applied to four ideas is still a bottleneck. The whole backlog went through it, in batches, on the same standard, at a rate that made the size of the list stop mattering.

Core Activities

Ran the full screen once per idea, in parallel, across the backlog
Covered the whole list rather than the ideas that already had internal champions
Returned every idea in the same shape, so a ranking can be argued from evidence
Carried each idea's score on roughly eight hundred sources
Left the screen in place as a system for whatever ideas come next

The Results

A ranked backlog where every idea has been through the same six questions to the same depth, so a shortlist can be defended on what the evidence says rather than on who argued hardest for it.

27 ideas

fully scored in a single afternoon

04 — LIVE MARKET TESTING

A ranked idea is still an internal opinion. The top concept was built out, put behind a live offer and shown to real buyers, so demand could be measured before anything was engineered.

Core Activities

Took the top-ranked concept from the screen through to a full product concept
Built and launched a live microsite carrying the offer and its price tiers
Ran paid campaigns against real buying audiences, not a survey panel
Measured click-through, cost per click and cost per sign-up against category benchmarks
Reported weekly and reallocated spend to the segments that were converting

The Results

Evidence of real demand for one concept, gathered from people who could buy it, before a single unit was tooled – and a repeatable route from a ranked idea to a live test for the ones behind it.

<48 hours

from intent to the market validation test going live

What it proved

Six criteria the team already used became one screen, nine analyses deep, ending in the executive summary its leadership needs to approve a build. Sixty-three product ideas went through it on the same standard, twenty-seven of them in a single afternoon, each returning in roughly thirty-six minutes on about eight hundred sources. Across the engagement that is 736 runs and 1,540 analysis steps, with 15,585 research questions answered from sources. The top-ranked concept went to a live microsite and a paid campaign, and came in ahead of benchmark on click-through, cost per click and cost per sign-up.

The team came out holding a scored, comparable read on its whole idea list rather than on the handful someone had time to research, and a concept whose demand had been measured against real traffic before anything was tooled. The screen stays as a system, so the next batch of ideas enters a working method instead of a queue. Across those 736 runs the platform records 104,636 analyst-hours saved, the equivalent of 211 full-time analysts.

Results

Metric	Benchmark	Result	Improvement
Backlog coverage	A hundred ideas, a few researched at a time	63 ideas scored on one standard	Whole backlog read on one method
Screening criteria	Six criteria applied by judgement, idea by idea	All six encoded as one screen	Same standard on every idea
Evidence behind a score	Assembled by hand where capacity allowed	Roughly 830 sources per idea	Evidence no longer set by capacity
Concept validation	Interest judged internally before committing	Live paid test with real buyers	Demand measured, not assumed
Analyst-hours saved	A three-person team doing all the research	104,636 hours across 736 runs	Equivalent of adding 211 full-time analysts

ENCODED SCREENING CRITERIA

A team's own criteria run as one screen, so every idea is scored against the same questions rather than the ones someone had time to ask.

STRATEGY-GROUNDED SCORING

Strategic fit is judged against the company's own strategy documents, so a score reflects this business rather than a generic model.

COMPARABLE IDEAS

Every idea returns in the same shape and to the same depth, so a shortlist can be argued from a ranking instead of from advocacy.

DECISION-READY SUMMARIES

Each screen ends in a summary written for the people who approve a build, so the analysis reaches the decision instead of a folder.

EVIDENCE BEFORE TOOLING

Demand is measured with a live offer and real traffic, so a concept clears an external test before anything is engineered.

REUSABLE SCREEN

The screen stays in place once the backlog is cleared, so the next idea enters a working method rather than a queue.

Recent case studies

See more proof

The intelligence function six business areas never had to staff

Client

$30B+ global electrification and automation group

Date

08/2026

596,505

analyst-hours equivalent, 150 FTEs

From one-off research requests to a standing new-business intelligence practice

Client

$500M+ global speciality chemicals manufacturer

Date

08/2026

382,406

analyst-hours equivalent, 155 FTEs

Matter More

Let's Talk